Showing posts with label birth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label birth. Show all posts

Sunday, January 27, 2013

5 top tips for pregnant women about to have their baby

I was asked the other day by some pregnant women to write a post about labour and birth. So here's my top 5 tips for women who are about to have a baby.

My default position is that every pregnant woman should have a known midwife who provides care throughout pregnancy and birth, and home birth for low-risk women. However, not every woman can have, or chooses, either. These tips are for women who have chosen to have a hospital birth, and in particular do not have their own midwife. 

1. Do not agree to have your labour induced the minute you reach 40 weeks pregnancy
There's no doubt that every day over 40 weeks of pregnancy seems like the longest day of your life. This problem is accentuated by all the modern tests we have that emphasize pregnancy dates. Gone are the days when women think about having their babies in terms of.... the phase of the moon.... month... or even season. These days we talk about giving birth down to the last day, hour, minute...

The reality is pregnancy varies considerably from woman to woman, and term pregnancy is defined up to 42 weeks gestation. There is evidence to show that mortality increases after 42 weeks pregnancy, however, the number of deaths are few, and each mother and baby's risks should be reviewed individually. My experience has been that when you try to induce labour before the mother's body is ready, the induction process is much longer and painful for the mother, with increased risks of medical intervention at a later stage.  This is what we call the "cascade of intervention", which is so often started by unnecessary induction of labour,

It goes without saying that if you have risk factors such as high blood pressure or your baby is showing signs of ill health, then you must follow the advice of your doctor. However, if you are fit and healthy, and have a low risk pregnancy, then resist pressure to have your labour induced. Focus on keeping active, yet relaxed, and spend your time preparing your body and mind for life as a new mum.

2. Stay at home as long as you can before you go into labour
The longer you stay in an environment where you feel relaxed and in control of what's happening to you, the better the outcome for you.  The longer you are in hospital, the greater risk you run of being submitted to unnecessary medical interventions. This can be a little tricky, especially when you are expecting your first baby because you don't know what to expect. I find it is often the dads/partners that get nervous and want to take their wife into hospital as soon as they can, so it is helpful to have someone with you at home who can support you. The best thing, if you can arrange it, is to get a midwife to come and check your progress at home, and make sure you do not go into hospital until you are in established labour.


3.  Have an advocate with you when you are in labour
By this, I mean, have someone with you who will ensure you have your wishes adhered to, that you are treated with respect, and that your right to informed choice is maintained at all times.  I don't think that husbands/partners can always do this because they can become very emotionally involved. So I think you should take a third person who is not so closely related to you. This person may be a friend or family member, or even an employed doula. This person must recognise that there are times when the best laid plans can turn to custard and medical intervention is required, but at the same time, be able to stand up for you against pressure for treatment, or attitudes that are inappropriate, and that everything is fully explained to you at all times.


4. Wait as long as you can before you have an epidural, if that is your choice of pain relief
I have mixed feelings about epidurals. On the one hand, when epidurals are well managed they can relieve severe pain, and assist mum to have a quiet, controlled birth which is a joy to behold. But in my experience, these births are few and far between.

Epidural interfere with the physiology of labour and birth, make labour longer, increase the risk of needing powerful drugs to increase contractions, prevent women from being able to push and increase the risk of a forceps delivery - with the accompanying risk of damage to mum and baby. Epidural also increase the risk of cesarean section for baby distress, which is thought to be caused because epidural increase maternal body temperature.

Bottem line: if you can manage your pain without an epidural, then do so. However, if you decide to have an epidural, leave it as long as you can before you have it because you will increase your chances of having a normal birth. 


5. Do not agree to continuous baby heart monitoring with a CTG machine unless your doctor or midwife can provide strong evidence that your baby is at risk
Many hospitals insist that women have a CTG baby heart monitoring trace when they first go into hospital, and even that they have continuous monitoring throughout labour. However, for low risk women, this medical intervention has been shown to have no impact on birth outcomes, and indeed, increases a woman's risk of procedures such as cesarean section.

If you are not sure what goes on in your hospital, check out their policies and guidelines for labour and birth while you are still pregnant. The more homework you do before you go into labour, the better prepared you will be.


What are your top tips for a pregnant women to think about before she has her baby?

If you want to read more details with links to research evidence, have a look at this article: What to reject when you're expecting. 10 procedures to think twice about during your pregnancy. The other blog that presents excellent evidence-based information about birth is: Science and Sensibility. And if you're a dad, may I recommend this blog: Beer and Bubs. As a midwife, some of the places I go for evidence-based information about labour and birth are:

Image: 'untitled'
http://www.flickr.com/photos/48819968@N00/698687002
Found on flickrcc.net

Monday, November 12, 2012

Should waterbirth be offered to all women?

The Australian College of Midwives is asking for feedback on its draft Position Statement on the use of water immersion for labour and birth - click here for details of the Statement and how to submit your feedback.

I have to admit, there are two areas that I feel a tad uneasy about and am looking forward to seeing how others feel - these are my own opinions and I am not reflecting the Australian College of Midwives.

The first thing I have reservations about is the opening statement "The ACM supports the choice of all women at term to have the opportunity to access water immersion for labour and/or birth."

I think there are instances when women have risk factors that would preclude them from water immersion, so I am not sure "all women" should be in the statement. Having said that...if water immersion is restricted to just low risk women, we would be preventing women with conditions such as diabetes, who are labeled "at risk" but actually would be fine to labour in water.

I believe that every woman needs to be assessed individually at the time, and I am not sure this is reflected in the Position Statement. At the same time, we do have a lack of evidence about water immersion and the outcomes for so-called "high risk" women, so it is difficult to give an informed opinion.

The second issue that I am a little uncomfortable about is the point "All maternity services to be encouraged to provide women with access to water immersion in labour and/or birth including telemetry as required". Note: telemetry is the monitoring of the baby's heart beat using water proof equipment. Thus, women who require continuous baby heart rate monitoring can still have access to water immersion.

I just need to be clear...it's not telemetry I have a problem with...I think it's fabulous if it supports more "at risk" women to have access to water immersion. What I am concerned about is that the minute it is included into the ACM Position Statement, some midwives and doctors will take it as an opportunity to push continuous fetal monitoring for all women, including "low risk" women, which is not evidence based practice, but widely supported in areas.

What do you think?

If you have any comments about either these issues or any other aspects of this Position Statement, please make a submission as per these instructions.

Image: 'untitled'
http://www.flickr.com/photos/48819968@N00/2925295583
Found on flickrcc.net

Monday, June 18, 2012

"Breast is best, but choice is paramount" - a contradiction in terms?

The British Journal of Midwifery has been getting some flack recently because of it's association with an infant formula mild company, Cow and Gate. The concern is that Cow and Gate is breaking the International Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes by influencing midwives' practice through providing free professional development. What is especially concerning is that a highly respected midwifery journal is supporting this practice.

Informed choice
The Facebook group  "British Journal of Midwifery- You can't be Serious!" has been highly critical of this, and is campaigning hard for the BJM to withdraw from this partnership. In response to the campaign, Professor Paul Lewis, a British midwife and midwifery academic, has replied in the BJM, with an article entitled "Breast is best but choice is paramount". In it, he says it is vital that midwives are informed about formula feed so they can provide information to women, so that women can make an informed choice about infant feeding.

Devil's advocate
Before I go any further, I have to say that I am not attacking individual women who make the choice to formula feed. What I am interested in, is the political, public health and financial agendas of this story. And I would like to be devil's advocate.

Contradictions?
Informed choice is so often used to defend the use of formula feed, despite over-whelming evidence that breastfeeding is far better for babies, has far more health benefits, and ultimately will save the tax payer money (if a baby is healthier, he will not be needing healthcare). Smoking is a similar population health issue. It impacts on the health of the population, and burdens healthcare provision with illness such as cancer and heart disease. Yet, in the case of smoking, people are having their choice taken away from them. Increasingly, the freedom to smoke is being curtailed, with some countries even declaring an aim to be smoke-free in the not-so-distant future. Yet you never hear commentators talking about "informed choice" with regards to smoking.

Let's be honest
Please don't get me wrong...I am not saying women should be forced to breastfeed. But I do wonder if "informed choice" is used by health professionals to meet their own agendas.

All I am asking for is for the British Journal of Midwifery to be honest and say it as it is...it's all about money, and little to do with informed choice.

What do you think?

Reference
Paul Lewis. (2012). Breast is best but choice is paramount.  British Journal of Midwifery. Vol 20:6 386-387.


Image: 'me_and_the_twins'
http://www.flickr.com/photos/73327518@N00/188813693


Monday, April 9, 2012

A midwife's perspective of birth rape

I try not to get riled up here but I have just read a post written by Sarrah Le Marquand (a journalist for the Daily Telegraph in Australia)  at the end of last week, about homebirth that has quite distressed me.

Sarrah's views on homebirth
In her post "Cancel those dolphins and consider your baby’s health" Sarrah critiques the reasons that women choose homebirth. In particular, she pours scorn on the women who choose homebirth because they feel safer there than they do in hospital. Sarrah does not believe there is any such thing as "birth rape" and clearly feels that women should open their legs and be grateful for whatever is done to them. She says women choose home birth because of "self-indulgence arising out of narcissism." She also says that people who talk about birth rape display "a disturbing lack of empathy for victims of genuine rape in the true sense of the word."

Homebirth and informed choice
I don't want to go into the pros and cons of homebirth here. I do believe it should be an option for women, when they have all the information to make an informed choice. I also believe that planned homebirth is a safe option for women who have no risk factors and are attended by skilled midwives.

Is there such a thing as birth rape?
What has upset me so much about Sarrah's article is her lack of knowledge, and insensitivity with regard to birth rape. Whilst the term "birth rape" is a controversial one, obstetric violence has been recognised in some countries as a legal offence. Sarrah says "the chief objective of the birth itself isn't to have a good time - it's to maximise the health and safety of a mother and her newborn child", yet she clearly has not talked to women who suffer post-traumatic stress disorder following birth.....these women are not healthy, and certainly have not, nor do they feel safe.

Scared to death
I have been a midwife for nearly 30 years. I am afraid to admit that I have seen women who have been subjected to very personal and intimate procedures without full information - indeed, in some cases, no information at all. I remember like it were yesterday, a young woman held down by a group of midwives as a doctor carried out a vaginal examination against her will. If that isn't rape, then I don't know what is!

I have seen women having procedures despite clearly saying that they did not want them. I have heard women beg midwives and doctors to stop doing something, yet they didn't. I shall never forget being nearly hit by a very elderly woman who was still living with very distressing memories of the midwife who delivered her baby 40 odd years ago. I have talked to women who have been so traumatised by birth that they have dreaded having another baby. You may say...that doesn't happen now....but you'd be wrong. I spent all last year listening to student midwives who told me similar stories.

Yes...some of these women choose home birth. They don't make that choice because they are selfish or egotistical...they make that choice because they are scared to death of what will happen to them if they go into hospital!

My feeling is that rather than writing in-sensitive rants that are uninformed and inaccurate, Sarrah would be better off focusing on ensuring that all women are treated with respect and decency by medical and midwifery staff. Maybe then she would find that women are quicker to choose to give birth in hospital.

For a balanced response to Sarrah's article, have a read of "Some home truths on a woman's right to choose" by Michelle Meares.


Monday, July 18, 2011

What will be the effect in years to come on babies who have a digital identity before they are even born?

Over the last few days I have been doing some research for a talk I am giving student midwives about social media and the way it impacts on childbirth choices for women. What I have found has been very interesting but left me with more questions than answers.

Digital identity, pregnancy and babies
What I have found fascinating in my latest research is the statistics about how parents are using the Internet to share stories about birth, and broadcast videos and pictures about their pregnancy, birth and young children. And as far as I can tell, there has been little commentry about this and certainly no long term research looking at the effects on children as they grow up.

Ross Dawson reported in 2010 that:
  • In Canada, 37% babies have a digital identity before they are born
  • Australia/NZ 41% newborns are on the net
  • USA 92% children have an online presence by the time they are 2 years old
The parents responsibility toward their child's digital identity
Susan Bainbridge wrote an insightful blog post about this issue last year: Protecting the digital identity of my unborn child. In it she said:

I jokingly said that we needed to be careful what we said and how we said it because we could upset a teenage Asher in the future.... Then it hit us - this is a big deal. We are responsible for our unborn son's digital identity, for now anyway.

and
His young life will be very public.And none of it will go anywhere. Once it's on the web, it's on the web forever. How will he feel about that one day? Where will the future of the web head and is it anywhere our son will even want to be? Are we ok to make that call on his behalf? Now? Before he's even born?

And it isn't just parents who talk about their babies. I was struck a few weeks ago about the very personal nature of the comments made by a grandmother on Facebook about her sick grandchild. I have no idea if she had her daughter's permission to talk about the baby but I did wonder how "appropriate" it was.

Future research
I suspect this is an issue that many parents haven't even thought about. We know that people do not think about their own digital identity and footprint so I imagine they think even less about the impact of digital identity on their unborn babies. I think this is an area that needs longitudinal research. And maybe educating parents about their use of the Internet and digital identity is something that midwives need to pay more attention to? What do you think?

Have you talked about your pregnancy, birth or baby online? Have you ever thought about what your baby would think in years to come? Have you considered how you manage your baby's online 'brand'? Does it matter?

Do you know of any research that has been carried out on this topic? I'd be really grateful for your thoughts and/or references.



Image: 'Free Child Buried in The Sand Creative+Commons'
http://www.flickr.com/photos/40645538@N00/185075930

Sunday, July 17, 2011

Social media, childbirth and midwifery practice

I am giving a short talk to student midwives tomorrow about the effect of social media on childbirth choices and midwifery practice. I have put together a short slide show but to be honest, I am not sure I have really dealt to the questions because I don't think we know if and how social media impacts on childbirth. This is an area that needs a lot more research.

I do know that women look for information on the internet and I feel it is my responsibility to provide quality information about birth online that women can refer to. Social media gives me an opportunity to listen to what women say about birth and maybe align my practice more with what they are saying. I also think social media can bring midwives and women together giving us one voice which in itself gives us an ability to work together to achieve mutual aims. Whether this is impacting on the provision of maternity care, especially in a global way, remains to be seen.

I'd love to hear from anyone who is researching this area, or has ideas about the impact of social media on maternity care. If you are a parent, how much do you rely on social media for information and ability to communicate with other parents? If you are a midwife, how is social media impacting on your practice?


http://www.slideshare.net/sarahs/social-media-pregnancy

Monday, November 22, 2010

Global shut down of home birth

It seems to me that there is a global movement to shut down homebirth. In Australia midwives are finding it virtually impossible to practice as a homebirth midwife because of lack of funding and draconian statutory requirements for independent midwives. In Hungry, a homebirth midwife Agnes Gereb has been imprisoned for her practice. In Ireland, a law has just been passed that has made it virtually impossible for women to have homebirth. Even Holland, where homebirth has been shown to be a safe, viable option is undergoing a damaging media campaign, in other words, using flawed research to make assumptions that have scientific inaccuracies.

Why should we care?

Because women's rights around birth are being eroded and credible research that supports homebirth or at the very least questions the safety of birthing in hospitals, is being ignored.

If women have their ability to have a homebirth supported by a skilled midwife taken away from them, what is likely to be the knock-on effects? So I ask again...why should we care?


Image: 'wombed again'
http://www.flickr.com/photos/33377700@N00/493492747

Friday, February 19, 2010

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

New thinking about the third stage of labour

For years it has been accepted by many that active management of the third stage of labour is the preferred way of birthing the placenta and membranes. But in New Zealand, midwives have been questioning this, saying that physiological birth is far safer for women who have had normal labour and no risk factors.

The latest audit of New Zealand midwives that has come from the New Zealand College of Midwives (NZCOM) suggests that women who have physiological third stage of labour, overseen by midwives who know what they are doing, are less likely to bleed heavily compared to women who have active management. This result is contrary to the commonly held belief that active management of the third stage reduces blood loss following birth.

Follow-up to this audit is going to be carried out by Professor Cecily Begley (Dublin) - she is reviewer for the Cochrane Database. Professor Begley is coming to New Zealand in January 2010 to talk to midwives who regularly carry out physiological management of the third stage. If you are interested in knowing more, please contact NZCOM.


Reference
Dixon et al. (2009). Midwives care during the third stage of labour: an analysis of the New Zealand College of Midwives Midwifery database 2004-2008. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal, number 41, October, p. 20


Image: 'placenta and amniotic sac - _MG_3995' sean dreilinger
http://www.flickr.com/photos/43927576@N00/289148405

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Normal Labour and Birth: 5th Research Conference

The 5th Normal Labour and Birth Research Conference is coming up next July in Vancouver.

This session will specifically focus on concepts and controversies around the experiences of physiologic birth by providers, women, families, and systems of care within the current social, political, and economic context.

The conference will provide the opportunity to develop and disseminate evidence related to the benefits and challenges of preserving normal labour and birth with a particular focus on the multidisciplinary perspectives on the implications for clinical practice, perinatal outcomes, education, management, collaboration, and policy.

I am thinking I will submit an abstract, talking about how we're using the Second Life normal birth scenario to teach midwifery students about birth environment and how to work with women in primary birth units.


Image: Vancouver at night
janusz l
http://www.flickr.com/photos/januszbc/3841429899/

Monday, June 22, 2009

Blogs about pregnancy, natural birth and midwifery

Thanks to MRI Technician Schools for a comprehensive list of blogs about pregnancy, natural childbirth and midwifery: Top 100 Natural Birthing Blogs.

I am number 91 and have been categorized as "miscellaneous" just above Bill Cosby at number 93!

Now you'll have to go and see what Bill Cosby has to do with natural childbirth!

Saturday, April 18, 2009

Celebrating pregnancy and birth

This is another fabulous video celebrating pregnancy, and birth at home of baby Olive.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niJ6F2p9Ql8

Home birth of beautiful boy with cleft lip and palate

This is a beautiful video of a home birth. What is so special about this video is that baby Aleksander is born with a cleft lip and palate. But despite the very noticeable disability, he is a gorgeous little chap. I think this is a great resource for parents who want to know more about this condition.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YQIcx7tJI4&feature=rec-HM-r2

Saturday, April 4, 2009

Waterbirth in Second Life

I have to admit I don't get the whole 'having a baby' in Second Life as a fun activity. But I really enjoyed this video which shows the 'birth' of Jacob Cleo Khandr. What I love is that the birth is a natural one in water - mum spends a lot of time on a birthing ball before she gets in the pool. No sign of any medical equipment or procedures.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y5u2Vk8m5E

Role of the virtual midwife
I know this is 'make believe' but I would dearly like to know if this virtual birth is acting out what actually happened to mum, or if it is what she would like to happen in 'real life'? I would also like to know more about the midwives at the Rock A Bye Babies Maternity Clinic - are they 'real midwives? Do they get paid? What sort of business do they offer - how do 'real' midwives feel about it? What are the implications for 'real life' maternity/midwifery care?

What do you think? Should virtual midwives be regulated in a similar way to 'real' midwives? What if virtual midwives give 'poor' midwifery care? What are the implications for me - could I set myself to be a virtual midwife?

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Many small decisions to be made in the virtual birth unit

One of the things that keeps me on my toes in the SLENZ birthing unit project is the many, many small decisions that need to be made about things from what images to have on the wall to how the signs should look.

The picture above is of the birthing room - check out the superb birthing pool in the corner - I am with the builder of the unit, Aaron Griffths (left).

This is me (Petal Stransky) stuck up the birthing rope. It is normally used by women to hang on to during a contraction, and supports them in a squat.

This me with Aastra (Deborah Davis - my partner in crime) sitting on the bed in the birthing room.

Birthing in a birthing centre

Here is Jessica's account of birthing in a birth centre - a great story that underpins the design of the virtual birth centre in Second Life.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZt5vVNiJpg&feature=PlayList&p=9D735B677286257E&index=1

Do you have a story about birth centres?

Friday, January 16, 2009

Virtual birth unit: first scenario

The first stage of the birth unit project is to build the birth unit in Second Life and have a teaching scenario based around a normal birth story devised that the students can run through. This is planned to be completed by the end of May.

Story board
In order for the scenario to be developed and animated, a full story board has to be developed.

Here is the story. Feel free to have a read, and if you think we have missed any details, or have things incorrect please let me know.

Walls going up in virtual birth unit

We had a look at the walls in the virtual birth unit in Second Life. It was an exciting moment because we were able to see something at last.


With Isa Goodman (Aaron Griffths) who is building the birth unit.



Petal (left) with Aastra (Deborah Davis), my partner in crime.



There is a tension between keeping a cosy, intimate feel and making it a space that people can move around, especially newbies. So that is what we will be working on in the next few days.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Getting down to nuts and bolts

Image: '2001-12-02 01-03 Neuseeland 382' Allie_Caulfield
www.flickr.com/photos/28577026@N02/2795931364


Here are Deborah Davis and my thoughts on the details of the virtual birth unit we are designing for Second Life. This is our first brain storm so I am sure we will make a lot of changes as we go along. I would love to hear what you think, keeping in mind the design features I have talked about in previous posts.

Overall look
We want the building to have a New Zealand feel so we are thinking that we would renovate an old colonial building, so it will look a little like Ffythe House at Kaikoura.
  • not sure about external colour
  • veranda/deck with honeysuckle or similar trailing around it. Here is another view of Ffythe House.
  • sustainable vegetable garden, growing a few simple vegetables that don;t need much looking after - for staff and families to help themselves to
  • flower garden, with water feature and natural New Zealand plants
  • external lighting - solar
Floors
Wooden floors throughout unit. Easy to clean, but can be covered with washable rugs to give more warmth and comfort.

Heating
  • solar heating and hot water
  • under floor heating
  • heating in each birthing room can be altered in the room
  • ventilation eg air conditioning
Birthing rooms

Colour
To create a cosy 'cave' effect.
  • Room 1 - Rose Madder
  • Room 2 - DH Drab
  • ceilings - white
  • skirting boards, windows, door frames - wood
  • must not have yellow paint because it makes the babies look like they have jaundice
Lights
Music soucre
CD player, that can be individually controlled.

Doors and windows
Living rooms

I would love to hear what you think, and if you have any alternative suggestions.



Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Midwives and the working environment

I have written several posts about the effect of the physical environment on birthing women: What women want in the place where they give birth and Effect of the environment on labour and birth. But what about the effect of the physical environment on midwives: what do midwives feel about their working environment? These questions are important for us to consider as we design our virtual birth unit in Second Life.

What I want in my working environment
I hate fluorescent lights because they give me a headache. I want to be able to safely lock my possessions away, and have somewhere I can go for a quiet cup of tea and chat. I want to be able to dim lights for labouring women, but I also want good, flexible lighting so I can see clearly when I am doing important tasks like suturing. The most important environmental thing for me is that I can carry out tasks like catch a baby, suturing or support a woman to breastfeed in an ergonomic position in which my back is supported.

What the literature says
Symon et al (2008) found that midwives want their working environment to be clean and secure, with appropriate changing facilities. They also want good lighting, and good ventilation that will reduce cross infection.

Cross (1996) reported that midiwves wanted their working environment to be secure to prevent babies being snatched, and protect themselves against harassment and violent attacks from the general public.

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (2008) recommends these environmental features for health professionals:
  • convenient placements of sinks, soap dispensers etc to encourage hand-washing (to prevent cross-infection)
  • acoustic conditions to minimize noise pollution
  • ergonomic work spaces to prevent physical injury
  • excellent lighting to areas where there could be a risk of needle-stick injury.
If you are a midwife or health professional, what features do you think are essential for your working environment?



References
Cross, R. (1996). Midwives and Management. Hale: Books for Midwives.

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2008). Environmental Change Recommendations for Ensuring an Optimal Health Care Workplace. Retrieved 13 January, 2009, from http://www.rwjf.org/pr/product.jsp?id=28827

Symon, A., Paul, J., Butchart, M., Carr, V., & Dugard, P. (2008). Maternity unit design study part 4: midwives’ perceptions of staff facilities. British Journal of Midwifery 16, 4, 228- 231.


Image: 'Ward at Alpha Hospital' tahitianlime
www.flickr.com/photos/35319816@N00/912907071